Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-7115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thompson v. Healy et al
as 5:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
Ronnie C. Thompson
Defendant:
William J. Healy, Chief of Canton Police Department, Officer Ranalli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spry v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2010cv05558
Plaintiff:
Ahsson Spry
Defendant:
Pierce County, Pierce County Sheriff's Department, Pierce County Sheriff Internal Affairs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Craig Beene v. RassekiMuhammed, et al
as 10-5730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG L. BEENE
Defendant - Appellee:
RASSEKIMUHAMMED, P.A., B. J. RHODES, IISA, ALEXANDER, Staff M.D. and others
SMITH et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv03424
Plaintiff:
KEITH SMITH and ANTONIO SMITH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID DENOFA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Bush et al
as 1:2009cv01871
Plaintiff:
Kellie R Watson
Defendant:
George W Bush, Housing and Urban Development, Joseph P Galvan and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Anderson v. Shoar et al
as 3:2009cv00232
Petitioner:
Richard James Anderson, Sr.
Respondent:
David B. Shoar, J. Russell, FNU Staggers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Spry v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2009cv05097
Plaintiff:
Ahsson Spry
Defendant:
Pierce County, Pierce County Sheriff's Department, Pierce County Sheriff Internal Affairs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belle v. Strange, et al
as 09-40126
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMSEY BELLE
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE STRANGE, JOHN TODD, SMITH COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFFS and others
Belle v. Strange et al
as 6:2008cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jamsey Belle
Defendant:
Jane Strange, John Todd, Smith County Deputy Sheriffs and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
