Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Palani Karupaiyan v. International SOS, et al
as 21-1853
Defendant / Appellee:
ACCESS STAFFING LLC, MIKE WEINSTEIN, Individually and in his official capacity as preincipal product engineering of the Access Staffing LLC, KUMAR MANGALA, Individually and in their official capacity as founder and CEO of the Kapital Data Corp and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04732
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
KARPAIYAN et al v. INTERNATIONAL SOS et al
as 2:2019cv02259
Plaintiff:
PALANI KARPAIYAN and KARUPAIYAN CONSULTING INC
Defendant:
KUMAR MANGALA, INTERNATIONAL SOS, GREGORY HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Heske v. AECOM Government Services Inc et al
as 2:2018cv05481
Plaintiff:
Willow Heske
Defendant:
International SOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heske v. AECOM Government Services, Inc et al
as 1:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
Willow Heske
Defendant:
AECOM Government Services, Inc, International SOS and AECOM Government Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heske v. AECOM Government Services Inc et al
as 3:2018cv01847
Plaintiff:
Willow Heske
Defendant:
AECOM Government Services Inc and International SOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WADE v. INTERNATIONAL SOS ASSISTANCE, INC.
as 4:2018cv00041
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WADE
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL SOS ASSISTANCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
ZIFFER v. INTERNATIONAL SOS ASSISTANCE, INC.
as 2:2016cv01070
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ZIFFER
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL SOS ASSISTANCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
