Cases 11 - 20 of 5,079
Davis v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. Davis
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation and doing business as PHH Mortgage Service and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Schrader v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00407
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Wesley Schrader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Campbell et al v. The City of Morgantown
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Gary Freshour, Ashley Jenkins, George Calvert and others
Defendant:
The City of Morgantown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stouffer v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00392
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden W. Holzapfel
Petitioner:
Gabriel J. Stouffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plumley v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Joanne Lynn Plumley
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Perdue v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
John M. Perdue
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Salmons v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00358
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Deanna Salmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rhoda v. F.C.I. Beckley Warden
as 5:2024cv00338
Petitioner:
Ronald J. Rhoda
Respondent:
F.C.I. Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Barber v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00330
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Paul Raymond Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
