Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Moore v. Clark
as 1:2020cv01377
Petitioner:
James Travis Moore
Respondent:
Harold Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RANDOLPH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv64289
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES TRAVIS RANDOLPH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Travis v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00066
Petitioner:
James Travis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv54138
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE JAMES TRAVIS MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Coddington et al
as 6:2019cv06680
Defendant:
Steuben County Family Court, Judge Mathew K. McCarthy, Judge David E. Coddington and others
Plaintiff:
James Travis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Adkins v. Morgan County, Tennessee, et al
as 19-5252
Defendant / Appellant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER KYLE SCHUBERT
Defendant:
MORGAN COUNTY, TENNESSEE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES TRAVIS ADKINS
Heavener et al v. Nevels Electric L L C et al
as 1:2017cv01552
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Heavener and Deborah Heavener
Defendant:
Nevels Electric L L C, James Travis White, Aaron Todd Irby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Travis v. Warden
as 17-6735
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES TRAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Adkins v. Morgan County Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
James Travis Adkins
Defendant:
Morgan County Tennessee , Glen Freytag , John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lackey v. Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
as 2:2016cv00194
Petitioner:
James Travis Lackey
Respondent:
Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
