Cases 11 - 20 of 473
S-S. v. DOE et al
as 2:2024cv01200
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and LYFT, INC.
Plaintiff:
D. S-S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Judd v. Rasier, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01429
Defendant:
UBER Technologies, Inc,, Rasier, LLC, Yainier Chirino Viart and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Adam Judd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Buzas v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00265
Defendant:
Doe and Lyft, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrea Buzas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ZAYD v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv03615
Defendant:
CRYSTAL ALOCILLO, LYFT, INC., FLEXDRIVE SERVICES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ZAYD HARRIS-BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Johnson et al v. Abeyneh et al
as 2:2024cv01394
Plaintiff:
Victoria Jones Johnson and Steven Johnson
Defendant:
Kidus Abeyneh and Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01393
Defendant:
Victoria Jones Johnson, Lyft, Inc., Steven Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Autonomous IP, LLC v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03348
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Autonomous IP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ferrell v. LYFT, INC.
as 2:2024cv03161
Defendant:
LYFT, INC.
Plaintiff:
Akiarra Ferrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Torres v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01465
Defendant:
TEMITOPE GABRIEL AHEREBE and LYFT, INC.
Plaintiff:
JASMINE TORRES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mathura, Kamchand et al v. Mobilitas General Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00339
Defendant:
Rebecca Lingenfelter, Mobilitas General Insurance Company and Lyft, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dean Health Plan, Inc., Multiplan, Inc. and Kamchand Mathura
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
