Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Dew et al v. E.I. duPont de Nemours & Company, et al
as 5:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Duane Edward Eaton, Randy Thompson, Thomas Roland Seals and others
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, The Chemours Company and The Chemours Company FC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEW et al v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, a business entity form unknown et al
as 7:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
DUANE EDWARD EATON, RANDY THOMPSON, THOMAS ROLAND SEALS and others
Defendant:
THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, a business entity form unknown and THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McQueen v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00500
Plaintiff:
Tynes Shamel McQueen
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
McQueen v. Joyner et al
as 5:2016hc02002
Petitioner:
Brian Michael McQueen
Respondent:
Carlton Joyner and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCQUEEN v. USA
as 1:2015cv01087
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
TONY DEWAYNE MCQUEEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McQueen v. Cargotec USA, Inc., et al
as 7:2013cv00221
Defendant:
Cargotec USA, Inc. and Kenneth Gerald Davis
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline McQueen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCQUEEN v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00421
Plaintiff:
KAREN D. MCQUEEN
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McQueen v. USA
as 5:2012cv00693
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert Lee McQueen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MCQUEEN v. USA
as 1:2012cv00257
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
SAMUEL DAVID MCQUEEN, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
White v. Tomlinson et al
as 5:2011ct03004
Plaintiff:
Anthony White
Defendant:
Tresa Brown Tomlinson, Jerry McQueens, Oliver Muhammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
