Cases 11 - 20 of 112
Hensley v. Brown
as 3:2022cv00178
Petitioner:
Robert Nathan Hensley
Respondent:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Akers v. Simpkins
as 3:2022cv00147
Petitioner:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Respondent:
Nathan Simpkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Akers v. Simmons et al
as 3:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Jason Simmons, Jamie Conover, Kathy S. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pastore et al v. V&V Carriers, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Stephen M. Pastore, Allison I. Pastore and Austin B. Pastore
Defendant:
V&V Carriers, Inc., B&B Carriers, Inc. and Nathan Moore, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Barnett et al v. Cabell County Commission et al
as 3:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Nathan Barnett and Philip Barnett
Defendant:
Cabell County Commission, Anthony Cummings, Greg Losh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Weaver
as 5:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Smith
Defendant:
RN Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Totten et al v. Scaife et al
as 3:2021cv00306
Defendant:
St. Mary's Medical Center, Inc. and Dr. Aaron Scaife
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Totten, Nathan Totten and T.T.
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Prichard v. Polaris Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00678
Defendant:
Polaris Industries, Inc. and Robert Nathan Justice
Plaintiff:
Joshua Blake Prichard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone v. Terry et al
as 2:2020cv00527
Plaintiff:
Dylan Nicholas Stone
Defendant:
Sgt. Nathan Withrow, CO2 Dustin Bell, CO1 Charles Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romano v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2020cv00198
Plaintiff:
Nathan P. Romano
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
