Cases 11 - 20 of 23
RANDALL v. BERKS COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 5:2016cv06257
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PA SUPERIOR COURTS and JAMES P. TROUTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDALL v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2016cv05174
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDALL v. LANCASTER COUNTY, PA et al
as 5:2016cv02567
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, PA, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, FRANKLIN COUNTY, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDALL v. MOVIE TAVERN, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02123
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Defendant:
MOVIE TAVERN, INC. and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boase et al v. Franklin County, PA et al
as 1:2016cv00723
Plaintiff:
Dwight Boase and Ramsey Randall
Defendant:
Franklin County, PA, Franklin County Courts, Chris Reibesome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall v. PrimeCare Medical Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00718
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Randall and Esou Scott
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical Inc., Franklin County Jail, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall v. Rumberger et al
as 1:2016cv00696
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Randall
Defendant:
Rebecca Rumberger, PrimeCare Medical Inc. and Franklin County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall v. Prime Care Medical Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00645
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Randall
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical Inc. and Ashley Keefer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDALL v. FOX NEWS & ENTERTAINMENT INC. et al
as 5:2016cv01267
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Defendant:
FOX NEWS & ENTERTAINMENT INC. and READING EAGLE NEWSPAPER CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall v. Fox News & Entertainment Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00444
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Randall
Defendant:
Fox News & Entertainment Inc. and Reading Eagle Newspaper Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
