Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Alvarez et al v. Artistic Concrete of Georgia, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01216
Plaintiff:
Adrian Alvarez , Adrian Alvarez, Jr. , Alexis Fierro and others
Defendant:
Artistic Concrete of Georgia, Inc. and Joe Hall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Thomley v. Bennett et al
as 5:2014cv00073
Plaintiff:
Charles Rufus Thomley , II
Defendant:
Ramsey Bennett, Ralph Miller, Heather Spradly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Ware County Jail Administration et al
as 5:2013cv00061
Plaintiff:
John Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Ware County Jail Administration, FNUK Roble, Randy Royales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Jesus Robles
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and T. Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Robles-Gonzalez v. Hastings
as 2:2012cv00212
Petitioner:
Cesar Robles-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Suzanne Hastings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robles v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012cv00137
Petitioner:
Jesus Robles
Respondent:
United States of America , Bureau of Prisons and T. Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robles v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv00193
Petitioner:
Jesus Robles
Respondent:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons and T. Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robles v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jesus Robles
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Thomas R. Kane, The GEO Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robles v. Kane et al
as 5:2011cv00109
Plaintiff:
Jesus Robles
Defendant:
Thomas R. Kane and Donald Stine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
