Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Sharma v. United Advance Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00671
Plaintiff:
EK N Sharma
Defendant:
United Advance Corporation and Khalid Azam
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanchez v. Sharma et al
as 8:2016cv00341
Plaintiff:
Exidio Guzman Sanchez
Defendant:
Rajeev Sharma and Seema Sharma
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Deas v. Interventional Pain Institute, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00281
Plaintiff:
La'Voncye Deas
Defendant:
Interventional Pain Institute, LLC, Boston Street Pain Center, LLC and Maneesh Sharma, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Aparicio v. Sharma et al
as 8:2014cv02959
Plaintiff:
Freddy B. Aparicio
Defendant:
Ajay Sharma, Amit Bharat, Rajendra Maharjan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sharma v. Howard County
as 1:2012cv02269
Plaintiff:
Amit Sharma
Defendant:
Howard County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cedillo Marquez v. Pritikalu Baikuntha, Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv02742
Plaintiff:
Luis Alonso Cedillo Marquez
Defendant:
Pritikalu Baikuntha, Inc. , Nagendra Paudel and Pratima Sharma
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sharma et al v. OneWest Bank, FSB
as 8:2011cv00834
Plaintiff:
Pitamber D. Sharma , Hari Sharma and Asha Sharma
Defendant:
OneWest Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Choice Hotels International, Inc., v. AMR Ventures, LLC, et al
as 8:2009cv02909
Plaintiff:
Choice Hotels International, Inc.,
Defendant:
AMR Ventures, LLC,, Kapil Sharma and Gurinderjit Dhillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sharma v. Frederick County et al
as 1:2008cv01046
Plaintiff:
Prabodh Sharma
Defendant:
Frederick County, Frederick County, Frederick County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
