Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Saffell v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2021cv00344
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee Saffell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SAFFELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv18736
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HUDSON SAFFELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abbott et al v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv01061
Plaintiff:
Martine Stratton, Dominic Bakewell, Bryan Koch and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Loggins v. Pilshaw, et al
as 20-3007
Defendant / Appellee:
G. GORDON ATCHESON, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, HENRY W. GREEN, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, (FNU) LEWIS, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN D. LOGGINS, SR.
In re: Loggins
as 19-3182
Respondent:
STEPHEN D. HILL, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, DAVID M. UNRUH, Sedgwick County Commissioner, JEFF EASTER, Sedgwick County Sheriff and others
Petitioner:
KEVIN D. LOGGINS, SR.
Saffell v. Knox County, TN et al
as 3:2019cv00210
Defendant:
Knox County, TN, Knox County Sheriff Dept. Office and Knox County Deputy Corporate Surety
Plaintiff:
Alexander Neal Saffell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evanston Insurance Company v. Money Concepts Capital Corp. et al
as 9:2019cv80689
Defendant:
Richard Hardman, Money Concepts Capital Corp., Michelle Grose and others
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loggins v. Pilshaw, et al
as 19-3065
Defendant / Appellee:
G. GORDON ATCHESON, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, HENRY W. GREEN, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, (FNU) LEWIS, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN D. LOGGINS, SR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
