Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
State of Washington et al v. Russell Vought et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00002
Plaintiff: Association Of King County Historical Organizations, State of Washington, Central Council of the Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska and others
Defendant: National Archives and Records Administration, Emily W. Murphy, Office of Management and Budget and others
Amicus Curiae: Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality and Historians
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Beetus v. United States of America et al
as 4:2020cv00044
Defendant: Dena' Nena' Henash d/b/a Tanana Chiefs Conference, Eric Adams, United States of America and others
Plaintiff: Chantel Sharae Louise Beetus
TANANA CHIEFS CONFERENCE v. AZAR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02902
Defendant: MICHAEL D. WEAHKEE, ALEX M. AZAR, II and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: TANANA CHIEFS CONFERENCE
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Alatna Village Council et al v. Padgett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00253
Plaintiff: Tanana Tribal Council, Evansville Tribal Council, Alatna Village Council and others
Defendant: Chad Padgett, Gregory Dudgeon, United States Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Tanana Chiefs ConferenceIn re: Tanana Chiefs Conference
as 19-1232
Not Yet Classified: In re: Tanana Chiefs Conference
State of Alaska Dept Nat Res, et al v. Agnes Purdy, et al
as 19-35288
Defendant: DENA' NENA' HENASH, Tanana Chiefs Conference, an Alaska non-profit corporation, FRANCES E. MASSENGALE, DAVID N. DONALD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES and STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Defendant / Appellant: AGNES M. PURDY, Owner of Native Allotment No. 50-2008-0437 certificate no.; that portion of Native Allotment No. 50-2008-0437 currently occupied by Chicken Ridge Alternate, Myers Fork Spur, Chicken to Franklin and Chicken Ridge Trails, containing 17. and BARBARA A. REDMON, on behalf of Anne L. Purdy, Owner of Native Allotment No. 50-2013-0004, certificate no.; that portion of Native Allotment No. 50-2013-0004 currently occupied by Chicken to Franklin and Chicken Ridge Trails, containing approximately
Tanana Chiefs Conference et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46268
Defendant: Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation, Southcentral Foundation, Chugachmiut, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Tanana Chiefs Conference et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2018cv00260
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation, Southcentral Foundation, Chugachmiut, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
State of Alaska Department of, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-35051
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES and DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AGNES M. PURDY, Owner of Native Allotment No. 50-2008-0437 certificate no.; that portion of Native Allotment No. 50-2008-0437 currently occupied by Chicken Ridge Alternate, Myers Fork Spur, Chicken to Franklin and Chicken Ridge Trails, containing 17.5 acr, BARBARA A. REDMON, on behalf of Anne L. Purdy, Owner of Native Allotment No. 50-2013-0004, certificate no.; that portion of Native Allotment No. 50-2013-0004 currently occupied by Chicken to Franklin and Chicken Ridge Trails, containing approximately 6.4 and others
Purdy et al v. Busby et al
as 4:2012cv00031
Plaintiff: Agnes Purdy and Tanana Chiefs Conference
Defendant: Michael Busby , Emma Busby and Chicken Gold Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?