Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Hooper v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00297
Plaintiff:
Dennis Russell Hooper
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Moore v. Jordet et al
as 3:2011cv01376
Defendant:
Sgt. Artz, H.S. Dr. Carper, H.S. Dr. Digulio and others
Plaintiff:
Buck Daniel Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooper v. Winters et al
as 1:2011cv03075
Defendant:
Aldrich, Lt. Brian Andersen, Conmed Health-Care Management, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Russell Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Hooper, Englund & Weil, LLP
as 3:2011cv00346
Counter Defendant:
Matthew Dunn
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dunn
Counter Claimant:
Hooper, Englund & Weil, LLP
Defendant:
Hooper, Englund & Weil, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03065
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooper v. Premo
as 3:2010cv00628
Petitioner:
Christopher Hooper
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spinks v. Lewandowski et al
as 6:2008cv06266
Plaintiff:
James I. Spinks
Defendant:
Chealsea S. Lewandowski, Ford Motor Credit, Hooper, Englund & Weil, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
IN RE: LAW STUDENT APPEARANCES
as 3:2008mc09006
Plaintiff:
Donald Bourassa, Tracy Hooper, Jacob Martinez and others
Staino v. Lee et al
as 3:2007cv00997
Plaintiff:
Carol Staino
Defendant:
James Lee, City of Portland, Portland Police Bureau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
