Cases 11 - 20 of 31,325
Bryant (ID 7323) v. Wichita Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv03055
Plaintiff:
Craig M. Bryant
Defendant:
Wichita Police Department, Kansas, State of, Paul O'Mara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knoche v. Droege
as 2:2024cv02150
Plaintiff:
Steven Knoche
Defendant:
Charles James Droege
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Niekamp et al. v. Watts Guerra LLP et al.
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Christopher J niekamp and Randall D. Hebrink
Defendant:
Watts Guerra, LLP, Bassford Remele, PA, Gustafson Gluek, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hughes (ID 105577) v. McClain
as 5:2024cv03054
Plaintiff:
Dashawn M. Hughes
Defendant:
Christopher McClain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. College Hills Opco, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02061
Plaintiff:
Dean Maxwell
Defendant:
COLLEGE HILLS OPCO, LLC and CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Sipple Bey et al v. Meyer et al
as 5:2024cv04015
Plaintiff:
Gary Sipple Bey and Annette Sipple
Defendant:
William Meyer, Brian Hill, G. Jeffrey Records, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
