Cases 11 - 20 of 12,837
Hailey v. Logan County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William T. Hailey
Defendant:
Logan County Detention Center, Chief Trimmer and Capt. Timothy Burchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Maness et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Clarence Vaughn
Defendant:
Blake Maness, John Michael Hill, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moon v. Louisville Metro Corrections
as 3:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Darinaija Moon and Dawuan Mudd
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford et al v. McKinley et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford, Jonah Gabriel JahJah T. Tishbite, Alton Chisolm and others
Defendant:
Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr., The United States Congress, The United States Senate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Sutton v. USA
as 2:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Randall Sutton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lauderdale v. Grayson County et al
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Lamone Lauderdale
Defendant:
Grayson County, Jason Woosley, Jack Pinckert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Weese et al
as 5:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Austin Weese, Jimmy Wilson, John Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. PNC Bank
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Gavin Perkins
Defendant:
PNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guzman v. USA
as 6:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Marco Guzman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Lenard Chauncy Dixon
Respondent:
Warden, USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
