Cases 11 - 20 of 3,625
Robinson v. Keith County, Nebraska et al
as 8:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Kirk Robinson
Defendant:
Keith County, Nebraska, Ogallala Nebraska, County Attorney Randy Fair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Wheelock et al
as 8:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Marvin Young
Respondent:
Wheelock and State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grey v. Whitmire
as 8:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Silas Grey
Respondent:
Don Whitmire
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Omaha Police Dept.
as 8:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Respondent:
Omaha Police Dept and County Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maes v. Pillen et al
as 8:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Mourad Karim Maes
Defendant:
Jim Pillen and Mike Hilgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cerros v. Fannon
as 8:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Joel A. Cerros
Respondent:
Steve Fannon
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Choy v. Choy et al
as 8:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Matthew Choy
Defendant:
Barbara Choy and Michael Coy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Choy v. Barzee
as 8:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Matthew Choy
Defendant:
William Barzee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franke v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Pernell M. Franke
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carodine v. Cass County Department of Corrections
as 8:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Robert Carodine
Defendant:
Cass County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.