Cases 11 - 20 of 5,614
Carlson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Kevin R. Carlson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stout et al v. WPX Energy Williston, LLC
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Casey Lyn Stout and Jenna Mae Stout
Defendant:
WPX Energy Williston, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Loggins v. Cass County et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Loggins
Defendant:
Cass County and Heidi McLean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
United States of America v. Volk et al
as 2:2057cv03450
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joe Volk and Julia Volk
Trotter v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Brian Earl Trotter
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GRS Insurance Agency, Inc. v. L & L Crop Insurance Agency, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
GRS Insurance Agency, Inc. doing business as Ihry Insurance Agency, Inc.
Defendant:
L & L Crop Insurance Agency, LLC, Brooke Larson and Merle Langton
Schutz v. USA
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Kayla Marie Schutz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
H5 Transport, LLC v. Wallwork Truck Center, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
H5 Transport, LLC
Defendant:
Wallwork Truck Center, Inc. and Wallwork Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Anthony Jermaine Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sangster v. University of North Dakota
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sangster
Defendant:
University of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
