Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Goodman et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02447
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Donald Eugene Goodman and Carol Ann Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pullen v. Mohr et al
as 1:2018cv00386
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Pullen
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Ron Erdos, Crabtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staples v. Jillerat et al
as 1:2017cv00742
Plaintiff:
Rahson Staples
Defendant:
Cody Jillerat, Popp, Neil Roger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. City of Mansfield Ohio et al
as 1:2016cv02974
Plaintiff:
Matthew Davis , Thayne Telquist , Joshua Frech and others
Defendant:
City of Mansfield, Ohio and Lori A Cope
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Goodman v. USA
as 3:2016cv00216
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shannon D Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Easley v. Burns et al
as 1:2016cv00331
Plaintiff:
D. Easley
Defendant:
Kathryn Burns, Dirk Prise, Larr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company National Association v. BCC Sandusky Permanent, LLC, et al
as 3:2016cv00393
Plaintiff:
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company National Association
Defendant:
BCC Sandusky Permanent, LLC , Randall J. Goodman and Goodman Real Estate Services Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lytle v. Scott et al
as 2:2015cv03117
Defendant:
Zach Scott, Abib Mohamed, Phillip Harrow and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Lytle, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brothers Trading Co., Inc. v. Goodman Factors
as 1:2015mc00069
Plaintiff:
Brothers Trading Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Goodman Factors
Brothers Trading Co., Inc. v. Goodman Factors et al
as 1:2014cv00975
Plaintiff:
Brothers Trading Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Goodman Factors , Independent Bank and All Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
