Cases 21 - 30 of 118
MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY v. BAXTER MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT, L.P. et al
as 2:2021cv00011
Defendant:
BAXTER MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT, L.P., JOHN DOES I-V, and X, Y, Z, COMPANIES and Baxter Meadows, L.P.
Plaintiff:
MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Houck v. BRP US Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00117
Defendant:
BRP US Inc. and Does I-V
Plaintiff:
Larry Houck doing business as Missouri River Marine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anastasi v. Saul
as 9:2020cv00121
Plaintiff:
Mariah V. Anastasi
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nuvasive, Inc et al v. Arthun
as 2:2020cv00039
Plaintiff:
Nexus Surgical Innovations, Inc. and Nuvasive, Inc
Defendant:
Ronald V Arthun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hotomanie v. Adkins et al
as 1:2020cv00117
Defendant:
Does I-V, Archie Adkins and MS Directional, LLC
Plaintiff:
Rory V. Hotomanie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wainscott v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 2:2020cv00035
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and John Does I-V
Plaintiff:
George Wainscott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brock et al v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv00096
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and John Does I-V
Plaintiff:
Dennis Brock and Sandra Brock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2020cv00040
Plaintiff:
Kari Anderson and Makayla Anderson
Defendant:
Jacqui Poe, Jane Does I-V, The State of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nez Perce et al v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2020cv00018
Defendant:
P. Broker, B. Hicks, D. Burleigh and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nez Perce, V and Freddie Gonzales-Valentine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews et al v. McFarland et al
as 1:2020cv00026
Plaintiff:
Brenna Andrews and McKennah Andrews
Defendant:
David McFarland, Does I-V and Knight Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.