Cases 21 - 30 of 161
Yoo v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
James W. Yoo
Defendant:
The State of New York, Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Monroe, Richard A. Dollinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bennett v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Sharrie Bennett
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clervrain et al v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Richard L. Anderson, Morton Blackwell, Patricia Bast Lyman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooke v. CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation et al
as 1:2021cv01401
Defendant:
Ryan Denise Estes, Cathy Korell, CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Kent Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kern v. Garten et al
as 7:2021cv00495
Plaintiff:
Donnie T.A.M. Kern
Defendant:
George M. Garten, Stephen A. Bennett, Cletus W. Nicely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Braverman v. Kight et al
as 3:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
Randy Alan Braverman
Defendant:
Kevin Knight, William C. Bennett, Jim O'Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abbott et al v. Gerber Products Company
as 1:2021cv00789
Plaintiff:
rebecca abbott, Erin Abdoo, Sophia Alfaro and others
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
