Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Cochran et al v. Brantley Capital Corporation, et al
as 1:2008cv00925
Plaintiff: Edward W Cochran, Edward W Cochran, Edward F. Siegel Co., L.P.A. and others
Defendant: Brantley Capital Corporation and Phillip Goldstein
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Strougo v. Brantley Capital Corporation, et al
as 1:2007cv01716
Plaintiff: Barbara Strougo and Barbara Strougo
Defendant: Brantley Capital Corporation, Brantley Capital Corporation, Brantley Capital Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Cominsky v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2007cv01261
Plaintiff: James Cominsky
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Russell Csaszar, Scott Brantley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abrams et al v. United Steel Workers of America AFL-CIO-CLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00181
Plaintiff: William M. Abrams, Mark Anderson, Thomas Arns and others
Defendant: United Steel Workers Of American AFL-CIO-CLC, United Steel Workers Of American AFL-CIO-CLC, Local 14340 United Steel Workers Of America AFL-CIO-CLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Brantley Capital Corp. v. Pinkas et al
as 1:2007cv00645
Plaintiff: Brantley Capital Corp., Brantley Capital Corp. and Brantley Capital Corp.
Defendant: Robert P. Pinkas, Robert P. Pinkas, Robert P. Pinkas and others
Counter-Defendant: Brantley Capital Corp., Brantley Capital Corp., Brantley Capital Corp. and others
Counter-Claimant: Robert P. Pinkas, Robert P. Pinkas, Robert P. Pinkas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Brantley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2007cv00002
Plaintiff: Carlita Brantley
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?