Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 33
International Fund Management v. CitiGroup Inc.
as 12-1903
Plaintiff - Appellee: International Fund Management S.A., Deka International S.A. Luxemburg, Deka Fundmaster Investmentgesellschaft MBH and others
Defendant - Appellant: Citigroup Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Citigroup Capital XXI and others
International Fund Management v. CitiGroup Inc.
as 12-1194
Petitioner: Citigroup Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Citigroup Capital XXI and others
Respondent: International Fund Management S.A., Deka International S.A. Luxemburg, Deka Fundmaster Investmentgesellschaft MBH and others
In Re: Vivendi Universal S.A.
as 11-908
Plaintiff: Prigest, S.A, Tocqueville Finance, S.A, Rosenbaum Partners, L.P., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner: Retirement System for General Employees of the City of Miami Beach
Respondent: Vivendi Universal S.A., Jean-Marie Messier and Guillaume Hannezo
International Fund Management S.A. et al v. CitiGroup Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv08755
Plaintiff: International Fund Management S.A., International Fund Management S.A., International Fund Management S.A. and others
Defendant: CitiGroup Inc., Charles Prince, Vikram Pandit and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Deka Investment GmbH et al v. Wachovia Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv07920
Plaintiff: Deka Investment GmbH, Deka Investment GmbH, Deka Investment GmbH and others
Defendant: Wachovia Corporation, Wells Fargo & Company, Kennedy G. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
AP-Fonden et al v. Hannezo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02603
Plaintiff: Andra AP-Fonden, Andra AP-Fonden, Andra AP-Fonden and others
Defendant: Guillaume Hannezo
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
General Motors Corporation Sec, et al v. GMC, et al
as 09-1143
: In re: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: DEKA INVESTMENT GMBH, FOLKSAM ASSET MANAGEMENT, LARRY W. GARDNER, 06-12258 and others
Appellant: GREGG GEANURACOS, MILDRED T. WARREN, MICHAEL J. RINIS, FBO Michael Rinis, IRA and others
Defendant - Appellee: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, et al., DELOITTE AND TOUCHE, LLP and others
In re: Fannie Mae 2008 Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv07831
Plaintiff: Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc., David L. Frankfurt, John A. Genovese and others
Lead Plaintiff: Boston Retirement Board, Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management Board ("PRIM") and Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System ("TCRS")
Consolidated Plaintiff: Susan Kraus, Linda P. Schweitzer, Stephen H. Schweitzer and others
Defendant: Stephen B. Ashley, Banc of America Securities LLC, Robert T Blakely and others
Consolidated Defendant: Dennis R. Beresford, Deutsche Banc Securities Inc., Louis J. Freeh and others
Intervenor Defendant: Federal Housing Finance Agency
Petitioner: International Fund Management S.A., Luxembourg, Richard H. Moore, Martin Mahler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re: Refco Securities Litigation
as 1:2007md01902
Consolidated Plaintiff: Michael Albrecht
Defendant: Phillip R. Bennet, Banc of America Securities LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: American Financial International Group - Asia, LLC and American Financial International Group - Asia, LLC
Movant: Banyan Capital Fund, LP, Deka International S.A., Luxembourg and Illinois Teachers' Group
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Deka Investment et al v. Vivendi, S.A. et al
as 1:2007cv07776
Plaintiff: Deka Investment, Deka Investment, Deka Investment and others
Defendant: Vivendi, S.A., Jean-Marie Messier and Guillaume Hannezo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?