Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Hall v. Corrections Corp. of America et al
as 5:2015cv00184
Petitioner:
Victor G. Hall
Respondent:
Corrections Corp. of America, Vermont Dept. of Corrections and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cope v. Lou-Metro Dept. of Corrections Medical / Mental Health Depts. C.C.C.
as 3:2015cv00257
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Eli Cope, Jr.
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Dept. of Corrections Medical / Mental Health Depts. C.C.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Clark et al
as 6:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
James D. Lawson
Defendant:
Danny Clark, Leslie Co. Detention Center and Ky. Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Pike Co. Jail et al
as 7:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
James D. Lawson
Defendant:
Pike Co. Jail and Ky. Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. KY Dept of Corrections
as 5:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
KY Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. The Dept. of Corrections
as 3:2012cv00842
Plaintiff:
Claude Cox
Defendant:
The Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Kentucky Dept. of Corrections
as 3:2012cv00528
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson
Defendant:
Kentucky Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter v. Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00042
Petitioner:
Jeffery L. Carpenter
Respondent:
Dept of Corrections and Gary Beckstrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martin v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2008cv00521
Plaintiff:
Victor Martin
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government, Jerry Abramson, Louisville Metro Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kraus v. Kentucky Dept. of Corrections
as 5:2008cv00129
Petitioner:
Karl Kraus, Jr.
Respondent:
Kentucky Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
