Cases 21 - 30 of 539
VISCONTI v. BURGHARDT et al
as 1:2023cv03037
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
JOSEPH BURGHARDT, JESUS BERNAL, SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WHETSTONE v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv02409
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN G. WHETSTONE
Defendant:
HOWARD UNIVERSITY, HOWARD UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN, RETIREMENT PLAN COMMITTEE OF THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WINSTON et al v. MONAHAN et al
as 1:2023cv02123
Plaintiff:
YASMEEN WINSTON and INDIA JOHNSON
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, JESSICA TAYLOR, JAMES M. MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
J.C. v. DUVERNA et al
as 1:2023cv02204
Plaintiff:
SHERINA BROWN and J.C.
Defendant:
JAMSLY DUVERNA, JOHN DOES 1-10 and WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
