Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00087
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00088
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00774
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00021
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00002
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00470
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00469
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Mandel et al v. Aspect Communications Corp.
as 1:2009cv11391
Plaintiff:
Edward Mandel, Edward Mandel, Positive Software Solutions, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Aspect Communications Corp., Aspect Communications Corp. and Aspect Communications Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mandell et al v. Central Refrigerated Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00260
Defendant:
Central Refrigerated Service, Inc., Central Refrigerated Service, Inc., John W. Eaton and others
Plaintiff:
Sally V. Mandell, Sally V. Mandell, Thomas C. Mandell, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
White Nile Software Inc v. Thrasher et al
as 3:2008cv00048
3Rd Party Defendant:
Paul Williams, Skinner Layne, Dan S Boyd and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Steven Thrasher
Defendant:
Rod D Martin
Plaintiff:
White Nile Software Inc
Petitioner:
Jason Coleman
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
