Cases 21 - 30 of 65
FUTURE v. FERGESON et al
as 3:2016cv02346
Petitioner:
JEFFREY G. FUTURE
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGESON , District Attorney of the County of Lackawanna and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FUTURE v. FERGESON et al
as 2:2016cv04565
Petitioner:
JEFFREY G. FUTURE
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGESON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LACKAWANNA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FUTURE FORM, INC. et al v. FXI, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01769
Plaintiff:
FUTURE FORM, INC. and MATT ARTHUR
Defendant:
FXI, INC. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FUTURE FOAM, INC. et al v. FXI, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01585
Plaintiff:
FUTURE FOAM, INC. and MATT ARTHUR
Defendant:
FXI, INC. and DOES
Counter_claimant:
FXI, INC.
Counter_defendant:
MATT ARTHUR and FUTURE FOAM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FXI, INC. v. ARTHUR et al
as 2:2016cv00624
Plaintiff:
FXI, INC.
Defendant:
MATT ARTHUR and FUTURE FOAM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMERISOURCEBERGER DRUG CORPORATION v. FUTURE DRUGS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05983
Plaintiff:
AMERISOURCEBERGER DRUG CORPORATION
Defendant:
FUTURE DRUGS, INC. and SAMIA HAMWAY-ESSAILI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE v. CONFLUENCE BOROUGH MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY
as 3:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE
Defendant:
CONFLUENCE BOROUGH MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
FUTURE POS, INC. v. REVEL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2014cv00135
Plaintiff:
FUTURE POS, INC.
Defendant:
REVEL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMESTOWN FUTURE FOUNDATION, INC
as 2:2013cv01832
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMESTOWN FUTURE FOUNDATION, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
