Cases 21 - 30 of 1,094
Henry et al v. ACE Homes et al
as 1:2024cv01747
Plaintiff:
James A. Henry and Aja N. Henry
Defendant:
ACE Homes and Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28:l332 Diversity - Foreclosure
Henry v. Randolph
as 1:2024cv01673
Plaintiff:
Pomdrest J. Henry
Defendant:
Anna Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Gates v. Nalley Chevolet et al
as 1:2024cv01574
Plaintiff:
Henry Louis Gates
Defendant:
Nalley Chevolet, Citizens Bank, Dalia Maisonet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Henry v. Fitz
as 2:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Scotty Wayne Henry
Respondent:
Warden Johnny Fitz
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crump v. McFarlin
as 3:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Henry Earl Crump
Respondent:
Warden McFarlin
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crump v. McFarlin
as 4:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Henry Earl Crump
Respondent:
Warden McFarlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
