Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HURWITT v. OCEAN PROPERTIES LTD et al
as 1:2018cv00023
Plaintiff:
ANNIKA HURWITT
Defendant:
OCEAN PROPERTIES LTD and SAMOROCK LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00278
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
LAPLUME v. HARRIS AND HARRIS LTD
as 2:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
DEREK LAPLUME
Defendant:
HARRIS AND HARRIS LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCCABE et al v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC et al
as 2:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN MCCABE and JASON WARD
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD, HOME DEPOT INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00012
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
DEPAOLO v. OCEAN PROPERTIES LTD et al
as 2:2016cv00468
Plaintiff:
CARY DEPAOLO
Defendant:
OCEAN PROPERTIES LTD and GHM PORTLAND MAR LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HOWELL et al v. ADVANTAGE PAYROLL SERVICES INC et al
as 2:2016cv00438
Plaintiff:
JAMES HOWELL , CHASE MOZZICATO PATZ INC , PAYROLL ETC LTD and others
Defendant:
ADVANTAGE PAYROLL SERVICES INC and PAYCHEX INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
KEACH et al v. CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2016mc00180
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J KEACH
Defendant:
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
Intervenor_plaintiff:
WHEELING & LAKE ERIE RAILWAY COMPANY
Debtor:
MONTREAL MAINE & ATLANTIC RAILWAY LTD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
