Cases 21 - 30 of 833
PRUITT v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00740
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
PATTI PRUITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
LOCKLEAR v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00837
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Plaintiff:
VERDIE ELORY LOCKLEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Blackburn-Hoelscher v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Stacy A. Blackburn-Hoelscher
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shaw v. Mitchell County et al
as 3:2024cv00800
Defendant:
Sidney Marie Britt, Wanda Earp, Erica Turner Crump and others
Plaintiff:
Sandy Martin Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Shaw v. Mitchell County et al
as 1:2024cv00226
Defendant:
John Does, Terry L. Silvers, Stacey Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Sandy Martin Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pate v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Carly Pate
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Auriemma v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Francis Auriemma
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Kelly v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00495
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Sandra Kelly
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Kelly v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Wendy Kelly
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stewart v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00479
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
