Cases 21 - 30 of 685
Mullins v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00469
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Tammy Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jackson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Webster Jackson
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wekony v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00449
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Carmen A. Wekony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Santos v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00503
Interested Party:
Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice and SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Elizabeth Santos
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
L.N.P. v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2024cv01196
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and The Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
L.N.P.
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Rogers v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00026
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Robin M. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Webster v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00425
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
David Allen Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Knight v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00416
Respondent:
Martin O'Malley
Petitioner:
Rebecca Gabrielle Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walker v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00476
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Tarnisha Nicole Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00409
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Richard H. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
