Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Thompson v. Robison, et al
as 14-1345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE L. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
VALERIE J. ROBISON, TASHA DOBBS and JOHN JONES
Thompson v. Robison et al
as 1:2014cv01850
Plaintiff:
Maurice L. Thompson
Defendant:
Valorie J. Robison, Tasha Dobbs and John Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Maurice Thompson
as 13-5802
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE ROGER THOMPSON, aka Reese
U.S. Citizens Association, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 11-3798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
U.S. CITIZENS ASSOCIATION, JAMES GRAPEK and MAURICE A. THOMPSON
Plaintiff:
EILEEN DANNEMANN, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States and others
U.S. Citizens Association, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 11-3327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
U.S. CITIZENS ASSOCIATION, JAMES GRAPEK and MAURICE A. THOMPSON
Plaintiff:
EILEEN DANNEMANN
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States and others
Maurice Thompson v. Darryl Adam
as 10-56716
Petitioner - Appellant:
MAURICE LAMAR THOMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRYL G. ADAMS, Warden
Maurice Lamar Thompson v. Darryl G. Adams
as 2:2009cv00818
Petitioner:
Maurice Lamar Thompson
Respondent:
Darryl G. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
