Cases 21 - 30 of 160
Truonghai Nguyen v. Marcus Pollard
as 22-55477
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRUONGHAI THAI NGUYEN
Respondent / Appellee:
MARCUS POLLARD, Warden
Maurice R. Polk v. Marcus Pollard
as 2:2022cv03109
Petitioner:
Maurice R. Polk
Respondent:
Marcus Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Danny Hamilton v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 22-55354
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY L. HAMILTON
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, HOWARD E. MOSELEY, Associate Director, RAQUEL BUCKEL, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Acuna v. Pollard et al
as 3:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
Alex Istok Acuna
Defendant:
Marcus Pollard, M. Glenn, R. Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Paris v. Pollard
as 3:2022cv00565
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Paris
Defendant:
Marcus Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Anand Alexander v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-55223
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANAND JON ALEXANDER
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and others
Thomas v. Pollard et al
as 3:2022cv00409
Petitioner:
Keith Thomas
Respondent:
Marcus Pollard and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Natasha Hilda Nelson and James Daniel Nelson
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Connie Gibson, Marcus Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Upshaw v. Chau et al
as 3:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
John William Upshaw
Defendant:
Dr. John Chau and Marcus Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Harry Burkhart v. Warden Marcus Pollard
as 2:2022cv00349
Petitioner:
Harry Burkhart
Respondent:
Warden Marcus Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
