Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Burco, Inc. v. Vantage Motors Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv09007
Plaintiff:
Burco, Inc.
Mediator:
Facilitative Mediator
Defendant:
James Kao, Tim Lin and Vantage Motors Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hucul v. Mathews Burwell et al
as 3:2016cv01244
Plaintiff:
Michael Hucul
Defendant:
United States Department of Health of Human Services and it's Sceretary, Sylvia Mathews Burwell, State of Michigan and it's Governor, Richard Dale Snyder , State of California and it's Governor, Edmund G. Brown Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Access Business Group LLC v. Battlechem Distribution, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01574
Plaintiff:
Access Business Group LLC
Defendant:
Battlechem Distribution, Inc. and Divi's Laboratories Limited
Mediator:
Facilitative Mediator
Pestana v. California State Court System et al
as 4:2015cv05294
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Pestana
Defendant:
California State Court System, Sandra Lucish, Dana Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mazdeh et al v. Superior Court of CA, Riverside et al
as 3:2015cv01475
Plaintiff:
Shahla Mazdeh and Asad Abrahamian
Defendant:
Superior Court of CA, Riverside, Office of Administrative Hearings, Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014at00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
