Cases 21 - 30 of 401
Moultrie v. Red Onion State Prison
as 7:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
Red Onion State Prison and D.O.C./Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sprouse v. VA Director of Prisons
as 1:2024cv00327
Petitioner:
Derek Sprouse
Respondent:
VA Director of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Paige et al
as 7:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Henry
Defendant:
Treandre D. Paige, VA DOC Department of Correction, Wallens Ridge State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Robertson v. Sussex I State Prison
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Darrin Mark Robertson
Defendant:
Sussex I State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Sussex I State Prison
as 1:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Darrin Mark Robertson
Defendant:
Sussex I State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin v. Clarke of Mental Health at Sussex I State Prison
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Clarke of Mental Health at Sussex I State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Sussex I State Prison
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Darrin Mark Robertson
Defendant:
Sussex I State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Mullens et al
as 7:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Sage M. Austin
Defendant:
B. Mullens, Dotson and Warden of Wallen's Ridge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Randy Sanchez, Jr.
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison and Agency of United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
