Cases 21 - 30 of 642
PRINGLE v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00450
Petitioner:
ROGER PRINGLE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finnegan v. Tetzloff et al
as 3:2023cv00738
Defendant:
Jeniffer Tetzloff, Jeniff Tetzloff, Kim Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Grant Finnegan
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scruggs v. Moody et al
as 3:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Scruggs
Defendant:
Moody, English, Rekitzke and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL et al v. ROBINSON
as 3:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
QUINYATLE J HARRELL, DASHONE BURTON, GREENE ALGERNON and others
Defendant:
ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sloan v. Franklin
as 3:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
Roger Sloan
Defendant:
Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINGLE v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00335
Petitioner:
ROGER PRINGLE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRINGLE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
ROGER PRINGLE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLETCHER v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. FLETCHER
Defendant:
T. RULE, DEUSCH, MAKELLAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ABDUL-GHAFOOR, et al v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATOIN, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
RHODA KATHLEEN BLAIR, LINDA COHILL, GUY E. DONA and others
Defendant:
RONALD D. ROMAIN and PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
PRINGLE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
ROGER PRINGLE
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
