Cases 21 - 30 of 54
STOKES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv02824
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STOKES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al.
as 1:2016cv02353
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
GLENN EDWARD STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STOKES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv02325
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
NONA E STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
STOKES v. USA
as 1:2016cv00856
Petitioner:
ROBERT STOKES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
STOKES v. CONSOLIDATED WINGS INVESTMENT, LLC
as 1:2015cv01932
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED WINGS INVESTMENT, LLC
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY STOKES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. HICKLE et al
as 1:2015cv01053
Defendant:
WANDA GARDNER, SHARON HAYNES, BARBARA HICKLE and others
Plaintiff:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Stokes v. USA
as 2:2015cv00210
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Mario M Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JONES v. ELY STOKES, INC
as 1:2013cv01419
Defendant:
ELY STOKES, INC
Plaintiff:
BRUCE JONES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
