Cases 21 - 30 of 1,138
Ryan v. Mansapit-Shimizu et al
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
John T. Ryan and John Ryan
Defendant:
Dafne Mansapit-Shimizu, Deputy Director Marie Lizama, Evelyn Villapando and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Damai v. USA
as 1:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
Vhavna Kumari Damai
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rodriguez v. Lotte Hotel Guam, LLC, et al.
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Elaine M. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Lotte Hotel Guam, LLC and ABC Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hayes et al v. Calvo et al
as 1:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
William Hayes and Rie Yamashita Hayes
Defendant:
Collen Calvo, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Walker et al
as 1:2023cv00002
Defendant:
John D. Walker, Jon Walker, Hansen Helicopters, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 1
as 1:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Clifford Hackett
Defendant:
Guam Agency in Video 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. M/S NIPPON MARU et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
M/S NIPPON MARU, MITSUI O.S.K. PASSENGER LINE LTD. and MITSUI O.S.K. LINES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 4
as 1:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Clifford Hackett
Defendant:
Guam Agency in Video 4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 7
as 1:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Clifford Hackett
Defendant:
Guam Agency in Video 7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
