Cases 21 - 30 of 3,099
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jurgens v. City of Omaha
as 8:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Linda Jurgens
Defendant:
City of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Barfield-Peak v. Rudolph
as 8:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Terrijana Barfield-Peak
Defendant:
Angie Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. National Action Network Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rogers
Defendant:
National Action Network Inc., Alfred Charles Sharpton, Jr., Peter Joseph Gleason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDowell v. Nebraska State Fire Marshals Office
as 4:2024cv03043
Plaintiff:
John Harvey McDowell
Defendant:
Nebraska State Fire Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daly Dejillas v. RAM, L.L.C. et al
as 8:2024cv00075
Defendant:
Ralph Murdock, RAM, L.L.C. and Ralph Murdock, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Cailin Daly Dejillas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Sipple v. Kramer et al
as 4:2024cv03045
Plaintiff:
Adam T Sipple
Defendant:
Deputy Roland Kramer and Devin Ruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Ruff et al
as 4:2024cv03046
Plaintiff:
James T. Mitchell
Defendant:
Sergeant Devin Ruff, Deputy Roland Kramer and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Scoggin v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska et al
as 4:2024cv03039
Plaintiff:
Ashley Scoggin
Defendant:
Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, Amy Williams, Trev Alberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
