Cases 21 - 30 of 77,050
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Logsdon v. Woods et al
as 5:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Richard Logsdon
Defendant:
Billy Woods and FNU Cochran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaber v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Faquzi Abdul-Menhem Jaber
Defendant:
W. Rodriguez, A. Christian, FNU Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kilgore, Gregory v. Noel et al
as 9:2024cv80471
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kilgore
Defendant:
Drew Noel and Anthony O'Dea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Line v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00708
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Line
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Aleman-Rivera v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Rafael Aleman-Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rivas Nunez v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00706
Petitioner:
Tauri Benjamin Rivas Nunez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Shaffer v. Secretary, Department of Corrections-Hillsborough
as 8:2024cv00917
Petitioner:
Daniel Shaffer
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Payne v. Secretary Department Of Corrections
as 8:2024cv00911
Petitioner:
Henry Payne
Respondent:
Secretary Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall et al v. Carner et al
as 2:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Wendall Hall and Tonnie Nealy
Defendant:
Jon Carner, Mr. Houston, Ms. Serina Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
