Cases 31 - 40 of 237
Jean-Baptiste v. Froehlich et al
as 3:2021cv01482
Plaintiff:
Oles Jean-Baptiste
Defendant:
Ryan Froehlich, Norwich City, City of Norwich Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Brooks
as 3:2021cv01441
Plaintiff:
Frank Rivera
Defendant:
Thomas V. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brazao et al v. Pleasant Valley Apartments, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01275
Plaintiff:
Aguinaldo Brazao and K. V. Marques
Defendant:
Pleasant Valley Apartments, LLC and A.R. Building Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lucky U, LLC v. S&F Investments LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00931
Plaintiff:
Lucky U, LLC
Defendant:
S&F Investments LLC, A&V Petroleum LLC and Fadi Qumbargi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. USA
as 3:2021cv00914
Plaintiff:
Dyane V. Smith
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
O'Boyle v. M/V Ono Mahi Ahi et al
as 3:2021cv00646
Defendant:
Richard Stroffolino and M/V ONO MAHI AHI
Plaintiff:
Deborah O'Boyle
Rojas v. Guadarrama et al
as 3:2021cv00573
Plaintiff:
Luis V. Rojas
Defendant:
Jesus Guadarrama and Luis Colon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alejandro v. Quiros et al
as 3:2021cv00542
Defendant:
William J. Longo, Shrimattie D. Maniram, State of Connecticut and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Marrero Alejandro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vitale et al v. World Triathlon Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00385
Defendant:
World Triathlon Corporation d/b/a The Ironman Group d/b/a Ironman Connecticut, Eric Opdyke and World Triathlon Corporation doing business as Ironman Group doing business as Ironman Connecticut
Plaintiff:
Christina Vitale, Craig Vitale, C.V. PPA Craig Vitale and Christina Vitale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frady v. Youngs et al
as 3:2020cv01400
Respondent:
J Patrick Youngs, III and State of Rhode Island
Petitioner:
Thomas V. Frady, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
