Cases 31 - 40 of 127
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gordon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2019cv00522
Plaintiff:
David E. Gordon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
State of Nevada v. USA, et al
as 19-15202
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK PERRY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Energy, LISA E. GORDON, in her official capacity as Administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration and Undersecretary for Nuclear Security, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF NEVADA
Gordon v. Suffolk County
as 19-353
Defendant / Appellee:
Suffolk County Police Department, Suffolk County and Sergeant Thorton
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James E. Gordon
Gordon v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2018cv04696
Plaintiff:
James E Gordon
Defendant:
Sargent Thorton, Suffolk Police and Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of South Carolina v. United States et al
as 1:2018cv01431
Plaintiff:
State of South Carolina
Defendant:
United States , United States Department of Energy , Rick Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Gordon
as 1:2018mc00068
Petitioner:
Amanda E Gordon
Cause Of Action: M 09-282 Attorney Change of Name
GORDON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv00530
Plaintiff:
CECILE E GORDON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC , PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL F/K/A COSMETIC, TOILETRY AND FRAGRANCE ASSOCIATION (CTFA) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farrell v. Gordon et al
as 1:2017cv01267
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Farrell
Defendant:
Stefanie E. Gordon and Karen Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
