Cases 31 - 40 of 76
JaM Cellars, Inc. v. Plata Wine Partners LLC
as 3:2017cv01385
Plaintiff:
JaM Cellars, Inc.
Defendant:
Plata Wine Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
JaM Cellars, Inc. v. Vintage Wine Estates, Inc.
as 4:2017cv01133
Plaintiff:
JaM Cellars, Inc.
Defendant:
Vintage Wine Estates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
JaM Cellars, Inc. v. O'Neill Beverages Co. LLC
as 3:2017cv00690
Plaintiff:
JaM Cellars, Inc.
Defendant:
O'Neill Beverages Co. LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
JaM Cellars, Inc. v. Rubin Wines LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
JaM Cellars, Inc.
Defendant:
Rubin Wines LLC and Purple Wine Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Judith Allen et al v. Girardi Keese et al
as 2:2014cv02721
Plaintiff:
Angela Draughn, Horace Gilliam, Muriel Pitsinger and others
Petitioner:
JAMS, Inc.
Defendant:
James G O'Callahan, Thomas V Girardi and Girardi Keese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Wimbledon Fund, SPC (Class TT) v. Bergstein et al
as 2:2016cv02287
Defendant:
David Bergstein, Aaron Grunfeld, Kiarash Jam and others
Plaintiff:
THE WIMBLEDON FUND, SPC (CLASS TT)
Raul Caiz v. William Leonard Roberts, II et al
as 2:2015cv09044
Plaintiff:
Raul Caiz
Defendant:
Def Jam Records Inc, Does, Maybach Music Group LLC and others
Julius R Nasso v. Integrated Administration, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08534
Defendant:
David Bergstein, Does, Eugene Scher and others
Plaintiff:
Julius R. Nasso
Mazdeh et al v. Superior Court of CA, Riverside et al
as 3:2015cv01475
Plaintiff:
Shahla Mazdeh and Asad Abrahamian
Defendant:
Superior Court of CA, Riverside, Office of Administrative Hearings, Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Rhonda Johnson Pawnell v. Malaco Records et al
as 2:2015cv04362
Defendant:
Thomas Couch, Dondria Fields, Island Def Jams Records and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Johnson Pawnell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
