Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Bond v. Connecticut Board of Nursing et al
as 3:2014cv01155
Plaintiff:
Pamela Bond
Defendant:
Connecticut Board of Nursing, Janeen Cordero and Kathy Bouleware
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Atkinson v. Farrell et al
as 3:2014cv00462
Plaintiff:
Eric Atkinsonn
Defendant:
Timothy Farrell, Kenneth Butricks, Kim Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres et al v. Gaines et al
as 3:2014cv00372
Plaintiff:
Edward Torres and Teresa Murray
Defendant:
Nanete Gaines, Kathy McGride, Herby Dormecant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. Energy Environmental Public Utilities
as 3:2013cv01842
Plaintiff:
Randy William Norman
Defendant:
Department of Energy Environmental Public Utilities, Metropolitan District, Craig Yelin and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kathie's Kitchen LLC v. Gerbs Pumpkin Seed Company
as 3:2013cv01523
Plaintiff:
Kathie's Kitchen LLC
Defendant:
Gerbs Pumpkin Seed Company
Counter_claimant:
Gerbs Pumpkin Seed Company
Counter_defendant:
Kathie's Kitchen LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Hatstat v. Bellon et al
as 3:2013cv00779
Plaintiff:
Gary Alan Hatstat
Defendant:
Bellon, Keepshire, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shakir v. Derby Police Dept et al
as 3:2011cv01940
Plaintiff:
Anwar Shakir, Sr.
Defendant:
Derby Police Dept, Charles Stankye, 3d, Charles M. Stango and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oakes v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv01771
Plaintiff:
Kathy Oakes
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Carolina v. Pain et al
as 3:2011cv01364
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Douglas Carolina
Defendant:
Jonathan Pain, Maureen Berube Allen, Christy Semmelrock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
