Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Singh et al v. Signal International, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00732
Plaintiff:
Pravin Kumar Singh and Radhakrishnan Nair Mangalathumalayil Vasukuttan
Defendant:
Signal International, LLC , Signal International, Inc. , Malvern C. Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Zarfati v. Singh et al
as 2:2014cv01843
Defendant:
American International Group, Inc., Chartis Insurance Company of Canada, Chartis USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Simcha Zarfati
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Singh et al v. Signal International, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00393
Plaintiff:
Pravin Kumar Singh and Radhakrishnan Nair Mangalathumalayil Vasukuttan
Defendant:
Signal International, LLC , Signal International, Inc. , Malvern C. Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cordova v. Metro Deli Cafe et al
as 1:2011cv04151
Plaintiff:
Cesilio Cordova
Defendant:
Metro Deli Cafe and Kumar Singh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Singh v. Hale et al
as 3:2011cv00107
Plaintiff:
Vijai Kumar Singh
Defendant:
David Hale, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Elizabeth Fries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raj Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-71657
Petitioner:
RAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-15715
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vijendra Singh v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-71682
Petitioner:
VIJENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Singh, et al v. Holder
as 07-73440
Petitioner:
DEO KUMAR SINGH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Abraham, et al v. Singh, et al
as 2:2004cv00044
Plaintiff:
Rajeswara Rao Jami, Davis Mathai Puthussery, Abraham Dowrla and others
Defendant:
Labor Consultants International, Falcon Steel Structures, Terry Forrester and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
