Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Silvers v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv01181
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Lana R Silvers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mercedes Benz Financial Services USA, LLC f/k/a DCFS USA LLC v. Sitton et al
as 3:2012cv05067
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Benz Financial Services USA, LLC f/k/a DCFS USA LLC
Defendant:
Richard A. Sitton and Lana J. Sitton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Welch et al v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Corp. et al
as 4:2012cv00820
Defendant:
Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Corp. , Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Barr Laboratories, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Welch , Laura Bostick , Lana Jean Brownlee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00213
Plaintiff:
Lana Faye Reed
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. $11,874.21 in United States currency seized from account number 140400002208 in the name of Brooks Auto and Truck Sales, LLC, DBA Northland Auto Auction at First Bank of Missouri, Gladstone, Miss
as 4:2011cv00810
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$11,874.21 in United States currency seized from account number 140400002208 in the name of Brooks Auto and Truck Sales, LLC, DBA Northland Auto Auction at First Bank of Missouri, Gladstone, Miss
Claimant:
Lana Brooks
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
Adams v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv06051
Plaintiff:
Lana Adams
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Welch et al v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Corp. et al
as 4:2011cv00535
Plaintiff:
Patrick Welch , Marilyn Banderet , Louis Banderet and others
Defendant:
Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Corp. , Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Barr Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Doisey et al
as 2:2007cv04186
Plaintiff:
Stanley Paul Smith
Defendant:
Doisey, Larry Maples, Kenny Copeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
