Cases 31 - 40 of 41
TORRES-BONILLA v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv01226
Petitioner:
OMAR TORRES-BONILLA
Respondent:
HARLY G. LAPPIN and J. GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ARTIS v. SCHULTZ et al
as 1:2009cv00986
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH ARTIS
Defendant:
PAUL SCHULTZ, SCOTT DODRILL, H. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JONES v. ZICKEFOOSE et al
as 1:2008cv06425
Petitioner:
LATORIA JONES
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ARMSTRONG v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv06131
Plaintiff:
MARTIN ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and D. SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
NELSON v. GRONDOLSKY et al
as 1:2008cv05653
Plaintiff:
SEAN NELSON
Defendant:
J. GRONDOLSKY and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
YUZARY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv05030
Petitioner:
HAIM YUZARY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARLEY LAPPIN, JEFF GRONDOLSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LAOR v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISIONS et al
as 1:2008cv04097
Petitioner:
RAVIV LAOR
Respondent:
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISIONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, JEFF GRONDOLSKY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JULIANO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv03700
Petitioner:
MARK JULIANO
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN J. GRONDOLSKY and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LAOR v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv03532
Petitioner:
RAVIV LAOR
Respondent:
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, WARDEN JEFF GRONDOLSKY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GOLDEN v. SCHULTZ et al
as 1:2008cv02601
Petitioner:
TYREIK GOLDEN
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
