Cases 31 - 40 of 88
Anderson et al v. Paragon Construction Systems
as 2:2017cv00466
Plaintiff:
Andy Anderson , Richard Thorn , Kevin Cote and others
Defendant:
Paragon Construction Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Inforzato v. Jensen et al
as 2:2017cv00317
Plaintiff:
Michael Inforzato
Defendant:
Darren Jensen, David S. Manovich, Dave Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Lewis v. D&A McRae INC et al
as 2:2017cv00278
Plaintiff:
Kaleena Lewis
Defendant:
D&A McRae INC, Dallas McRae and Shawn Womack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cvent Inc v. RainFocus et al
as 2:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
Cvent Inc
Defendant:
RainFocus , Jared Erb , Shawn Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Lewis v. Lipocine Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
David Lewis, Lipocine Investor Group and Anthony Morassi
Defendant:
Lipocine Inc. , Mahesh V. Patel and Morgan R. Brown
Movant:
Grey Burleson and John Redmond
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Lewis et al v. Caliber Home Loans et al
as 2:2016cv01252
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Lewis and Marideth Lewis
Defendant:
Caliber Home Loans and LSF9 Master Participation Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson et al v. Nicholson Construction Company
as 2:2016cv00908
Plaintiff:
Andy Anderson , Richard Thorn , Ross Williams and others
Defendant:
Nicholson Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Dagsen v. Lewis et al
as 1:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Craig Dagsen
Defendant:
Larry Lewis, Chris Poteracki, Ogden City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jensen v. I.R.S. et al
as 2:2016cv00357
Plaintiff:
William A. Jensen
Defendant:
I.R.S., Howard Lewis & Peterson, P.C., Parsons Behle & Latimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohen v. Wrapsol Acquisition et al
as 2:2015cv00725
Plaintiff:
Lewis S. Cohen
Defendant:
Wrapsol Acquisition and Otter Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
