Cases 31 - 40 of 539
Armstrong v. Watkins et al
as 1:2019cv01030
Defendant:
Matthew Ray, Jacob Beck, Daniel Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
People Of The State Of Illinois et al v. Sterigenics U.S., LLC
as 1:2018cv08010
Plaintiff:
Lisa Madigan, People Of The State Of Illinois and Robert Berlin
Defendant:
Sterigenics U.S., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dixon v. Madigan et al
as 1:2018cv08369
Defendant:
Lisa Madigan and Leo P Schmitz
Plaintiff:
Jeff Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson et al v. Polk et al
as 1:2018cv07172
Plaintiff:
Trequan Odum, Sheronda Odum, Cornesha Dawson and others
Defendant:
LeRoy K Martin, Kimberly Foxx, Corey Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Sanders v. Nicholson
as 1:2018cv07121
Respondent:
Lisa Madigan and Walter Nicholson
Petitioner:
Michael Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanders v. Nicholson et al
as 1:2018cv07140
Respondent:
Lisa Madigan and Walter Nicholson
Petitioner:
Michael Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Lashbrook et al
as 1:2018cv07211
Petitioner:
Billy Anderson
Respondent:
Jackqueline Lashbrook and Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Escobar v. County of Cook et al
as 1:2018cv06495
Defendant:
County of Cook, Christelle Perez, Lisa Madigan and others
Plaintiff:
Aristides Escobar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez v. Kink et al
as 1:2018cv07142
Petitioner:
Robert Alvarez
Respondent:
Mr. Kink and Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rockhill Insurance Company v. Carri Scharf Materials Company, an Illinois corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01380
Defendant:
Carri Scharf Materials Company, an Illinois corporation and People of the State of Illinois, ex. rel. Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Plaintiff:
Rockhill Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
