Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Murillo v. MacDonald
as 2:2012cv01220
Plaintiff:
Elias Murillo
Defendant:
James Edward MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v. Chandler et al
as 2:2012cv00813
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Anderson and Gay-Dee Anderson
Defendant:
John D Chandler , Unknown Chandler , Jeffrey MacDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Berry v. Apker et al
as 4:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
Gregory MacDonald Berry
Defendant:
Craig Apker, A Mendes, A Bassett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MacDonald et al v. ABB/CON-CISE Optical Group LLC
as 2:2011cv01831
Plaintiff:
Andrew MacDonald and Optical Distributor Group LLC
Defendant:
ABB/CON-CISE Optical Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Macdonald v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration et al
as 2:2011cv00241
Plaintiff:
Eric K Macdonald
Defendant:
Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration and Thomas K Betlach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schipke v. United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv00065
Petitioner:
Mary Elizabeth Schipke
Respondent:
United States of America, Florence Correctional Center and J MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MacDonald v. Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv01839
Plaintiff:
Cherie MacDonald
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated and Zicam LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patterson v. Bailey et al
as 2:2010cv01571
Plaintiff:
Barry Northcross Patterson
Defendant:
Unknown Bailey, Unknown Quintero, Unknown Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01595
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tilton v. MacDonald
as 2:2009cv00081
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Tilton
Respondent:
James Edward MacDonald
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
