Cases 31 - 40 of 140
May v. Buttigieg
as 1:2022cv00908
Plaintiff:
Jackquline A May
Defendant:
Pete Buttigieg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Drayton v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Lamont Darnel Drayton
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Sgt. Newman, Lt. HM May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strebe v. Hicks et al
as 1:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Brian David Strebe
Defendant:
D. Hicks, M. Robinson, D. Slaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Sturgill et al
as 7:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
M.D. Sturgill, K. Delk, Michael McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Sturgill et al
as 7:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
M.D. Sturgill, T. Dowell, M. Vaughan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Sturgill et al
as 7:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
C. Weaver, Michael McBride, H.M. May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chappel v. Shelton et al
as 2:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Mai Chappel
Defendant:
Spivey Shelton and Sarah Spivey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chappel v. Xuan Nguyen et al
as 2:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Mai Chappel
Defendant:
Xuan Nguyen and Qui
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Chappel v. Sea Breeze Health Care et al
as 2:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Mai Chappel
Defendant:
Sea Breeze Health Care, David K. Tran, David Ozeran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00182
Defendant:
M. D. Sturgill, David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
